S.J. Van Sickle [sjvan@csd.uwm.edu] wrote:
>We
>should have crammed the airwaves with broadcasts explaining what we are
>doing and why, and well as tips on how to avoid becoming "collateral
>damage".
But in order to do that, first the governments involved would have to have known why they were doing it; and in any case, with the world's best-known lier and dog-wagger in charge, why would anyone believe anything that NATO said?
Mark