Doug Jones wrote:
>
> QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 6/9/99 4:50:10 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > > End of story, anything less is negligence,
> > >and the owner should be held accountable, at least civilly. Suing the
> > >manufacturer for the stupidity, laziness, or cowardliness of the
> > >legal owner is ludicrous.
> >
> > What about smart guns?
>
> Yeah, riiiiiight. Look no further than a desktop computer to see
> just how stupid a smart gun would be. The intelligence belongs on
> the human side of the trigger, and there is no substitute for that
> at this time.
>
> How's this for a nightmare? A smart gun running under a Microsoft
> OS...
aiiieeeee!!!!
[runs shrieking]
*humans* being in control of them is bad enough.....
Dwayne
--
mailto:ddraig@pobox.com http://i.am/dwayne
"the cricher we kno as dwayne is only the projection
into our dimension of something much larger and
wirder."
---clae@pa.ausom.net.au
....return....to....the....source....