And its not economically cost effective. Doubling your speed means that
your flight regeime is going to be at least ten times more severe, while
you reduce your flight time to the furthest point on earth from 45
minutes at suborbital trajectory to 22.5 minutes at mach 50. I'm not
sure that anyone would pay ten times as much or more for only 22 extra
minutes.
>
> If that was possible, then the ideal might be around Mach 50 high in the
> atmosphere, or in 'low orbit'; in inverted flight you'd feel about 1g
> towards the floor of the vehicle, so the only unusual aspect would be
> seeing the ground 'above' you.
>
-- TANSTAAFL!!! Michael Lorrey ------------------------------------------------------------ mailto:retroman@tpk.net Inventor of the Lorrey Drive Agent Lorrey@ThePentagon.com Silo_1013@ThePentagon.com http://www.tpk.net/~retroman/Mikey's Animatronic Factory My Own Nuclear Espionage Agency (MONEA) MIKEYMAS(tm): The New Internet Holiday Transhumans of New Hampshire (>HNH) ------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/local/bin/perl-0777---export-a-crypto-system-sig-RC4-3-lines-PERL @k=unpack('C*',pack('H*',shift));for(@t=@s=0..255){$y=($k[$_%@k]+$s[$x=$_ ]+$y)%256;&S}$x=$y=0;for(unpack('C*',<>)){$x++;$y=($s[$x%=256]+$y)%256; &S;print pack(C,$_^=$s[($s[$x]+$s[$y])%256])}sub S{@s[$x,$y]=@s[$y,$x]}