> Good grief, Erik, could you perhaps apply a little bit of judgement to
> what you forward? Before the 43-line article, you treated us to 35 lines
> of header -- which might (I suppose) be useful to someone looking for ways
> to intercept or forge your mail, but added nothing to the value of the
> article (and indeed, at the end of that 35 lines we find that the article
> was previously forwarded by yet *another* person!).
Sorry, I forwarded it using Netscape's automatic functions. Common
mailers usually don't display the full header. Anyway, I'll use cut &
past in the future.
Regards,
Erik