Re:PSYCH: EGO PROGRAMMING
ard (rbrown@smb.sams.ch)
Sun, 13 Apr 1997 23:14:19 +0200
> Yes, of course there are games without winners or losers, but there are
> games with winners and losers too, and those are quite legitimate as
> games too. My point is that there is nothing intrinsically spiritually
dodgy
> about winning/losing scenarios.
>
Good, because in this game you have just lost!
Why bring up the legitimatcy of finite games?
Who cares about spiritual dodginess?
How did you react after reading the first sentence?
What does that reaction tell you about yourself?
ard