----- Original Message -----
From: "Eugene Leitl" <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
To: "extropy" <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [MURG] Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis? (fwd)
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:01:29 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Randal Koene <randalk@marina.psych.mcgill.ca>
> Reply-To: murg@yahoogroups.com
> To: murg@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [MURG] Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis? (fwd)
>
> Hi Eugene,
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
> > There's evidence(*) to suggest the barn owl uses a neat Hebbian learning
> > trick to strengthen those signals in phase, and weaken those that
aren't -
> > and of course tons of neurons to average together.
Actually I said that, not Eugene. Could you guys take a bit more care when
forwarding across lists please. Thanks. :)
Let me see if I've got this straight - my message on extropians was
forwarded by Eugene to the MURG list, Randal replied (thinking it was
Eugene), and Eugene relayed it back to the extropians list.
Looks like all we need to do is add a blood-stained knife, a missing person,
and an empty safe, and we'll have a nice little whodunnit murder mystery!
Thanks for the references anyway Randal. :)
Regards,
Dale Johnstone.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:44 MDT