No thats not it. The URL you provided is a link to a study by my main man
T.Parr (I have the complete text of the study). What Doug was stating (and
what I questioned in return) was that the longevity of calorie restricted
rats was/is an experimental artifact due to their artificial diets.
-----Original Message-----
From: [ Robert-Coyote ] [mailto:coyyote@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 1:32 PM
To: extropians@extropy.com
Subject: Re: glucose tolerance determines mice lifespan
Found it
http://www.elsevier.com/cdweb/views/article.htt?jnl=00476374&iss=1-2&vol=88&
pii=004763749601723
In a message dated 6/8/00 10:54:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
al.villalobos@qm.com writes:
<< Doug Skrecky wrote:
==========
The so called called anti-aging calorically restricted diet
appears to be merely an artifact of using a poor diet that
induces glucose intolerance when fed ad-libitum.
===========
I couln't tell, are you quoting someone or is this your own statement?
To me, this is quite a big deal if true. Do you have any references?
If you like, I'd be happy to mail you copies of T. Parr's papers in
Gerontology about insulin exposure (No more scanner access) I'm in the
process of getting A. Cerami's "Glucose as a mediator of ageing" as well
Keep up the good work,
>>
Hey, Al & Doug
It looks like I missed something good. Can you refer me back to the
original post?
Ron H.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:12:54 MDT