> I wasn't asking you to explain anything, all I wanted you to do tell me who
> the original Harvey newstrom was (is?) in my SPECIFIC example. And
> don't ask me to explain what "the original" person means because I don't
> think it means a damn thing in this case. Ah forget it, I know now I'm not
> going to get an straight answer, you could have saved us both a lot of time
> if you'd just said I refuse to answer that question.
People who ask ambiguous questions, refuse to clarify their intent,
reject several legitimate answers to possible interpretations, and then
have the balls to accuse the other side of evasion shouldn't pretend
they are engaging in rational argument, and certainly don't deserve
any consideration.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:11:25 MDT