Counter-paper:
http://bcn.boulder.co.us/government/approvalvote/altvote.html
claims Borda is highly manipulable. But it also seems to criticize it for not
electing the Cordorcet winner, whereas Saari claims that is a false goal.
Elsewhere I've seen Saari say that anything which will break Borda will break
any other scheme as well. And there's also this on Borda manipulation:
http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00355/bibs/8015002/80150289.htm
-xx- Damien X-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:52 MDT