test

From: Michael S. Lorrey (mike@datamann.com)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:20:55 MDT

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in 2050)"
Previous message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in2050)"
In reply to: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: those NRA Australian statistics examined"
Next in thread: Joe Dees: "test"
Maybe reply: Joe Dees: "test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This is a test. I'm not receiving anything from the list, and the last message I
sent last night got rejected...

Mike Lorrey

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in 2050)"
Previous message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in2050)"
In reply to: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: those NRA Australian statistics examined"
Next in thread: Joe Dees: "test"
Maybe reply: Joe Dees: "test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:14 MDT