Anders Sandberg wrote:
>
> It should be noted that their neurobiological arguments are also
> considered bull by neuroscientists.
Well, what I know of neurology goes down at most to neurotransmitters, vesicles, and the like - nowhere near microtubule dimers - so I can't judge on my own.
Besides which, they could be flat wrong and it wouldn't make much of a difference from my perspective. They're just the major pair even talking about the details of noncomputability; that's why I refer to them.
-- sentience@pobox.com Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://pobox.com/~sentience/AI_design.temp.html http://pobox.com/~sentience/singul_arity.html Disclaimer: Unless otherwise specified, I'm not telling you everything I think I know.