"Michael
> As long as the Brits are... going to throw the baby out the window, they
Anyhow, I said
and mike concurred
We had a woman talk to us last year who supported Dworkin' s position that
whatever a powerless person (apparently this included women) said was
harmful was harmful. And the FACT of its harmfulness was proven by the
"victims" statement to that effect.
In other words, whatever I think is bad, is, and you have no defense
whatsoever and you will go to jail for causing me to say you harmed me.
This just about made me cry it is so stupidly arrogant.
made me laugh out loud by saying
> might as well toss the bath water with it too....
;-)
>> Is free speech all speech which does not
>> directly aid specific acts of violence?
> yes.
So, how do we explicitly exclude from "violence" all notions of subjective harm such as this?
Do we exclude people's "self esteem" and other such intangible's from their property?
tim