Michael Lorrey wrote:
> I don't see how you can describe a legal jihad against the gun manufacturing
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I meant to say that the legal system generally is set up to
benefit the rich and *their* corporate interests. Eliminating guns disables a
population that is becoming increasingly less tolerant of *their* system. A
disarmed society is an obedient society. A society where only the rich can carry,
is a society benefiting the rich. I think that is pretty obvious don't you?
> industry as some sort of smokescreen to perpetutate corporate interests.
> ..If the
Tell me Michael, why haven't the gun manufacturers gotten together to create their
own boycott organization? I mean common, why haven't Ruger and Smith & Wesson and
the other gun manufacturers put aside their competitive instincts long enough to
> gun industry goes out of business, the certainly don't gain anything. If their
> products are taxed at several hundred percent rates, this will not only reduce
> market demand, but their ability to make a profit, which also goes against
> corporate interests.
Paul Hughes