>>"In program
Isn't it strange, when the stated role of the government is general coordination of social activities, meaningful allocation of funds, and overall social order and effectiveness.
Coercive funding and coercive implementation of programs remove incentives to improve coordination and effectiveness, so whether the centralized system could actually deliver them, is a moot point - it won't bother [too much, anyway].
Wasn't Communism a good enough lesson here?