Ian writes:
"Collective entity" seems to involve a contradiction, since a collection of
The ordering of individuals in a system
creates a de facto collective entity, be
that entity real or an illusion. The main
actor in Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations"
was in fact a collective entity that's
widely know as "the invisible hand."
objects can't itself be a physical object, it exists solely as a concept.
"entity". To me an entity is a "thing", a physical existent that can be
perceived via the senses (or extensions of the senses). Apparently you wish
to include concepts such as sets, relations and systems under the
definition of "entity". But this usage generates confusion, since there are
obvious basic differences between physical things on the one hand and
arrangements of things on the other, and grave errors ensue from failing to
distinguish different categories.
Smith's famous invisible hand - virtually synonymous with the extropian principle of spontaneous organisation - is the internal organizing principle of a complex relational nexus. It is not by any stretch of the imagination a "thing". As evidence that Smith himself had no illusions about it being an entity in the strict sense, observe that he used the phrase in a simile ("...as if by an invisible hand") and not as a metaphor as in common usage nowadays.
Regards,
Dick