Samael wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
Its pretty plain and simple what I mean. Anyone with a dictionary who knows
> From: Michael S. Lorrey <retroman@together.net>
> >Sorry, deconstructivism outside of lingusitics is merely an excuse to
> dismiss
> >personal integrity. Come back with a real argument.
>
> Please excplain what you mean by this?
> Do you honestly believe in objective, universal standards of right and
Objective universal standards of right and wrong are based upon
> wrong? If so, please state where objective unioversal standards of eright
> and wrong come from and what makes them so. You may well revolutionise a
> large chunk of philosophy (I doubt it, but I'd love to be proved wrong).