Re: Transhumanist Principles 2.1

Natasha Vita More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Mon, 30 Mar 1998 14:01:07 -0600


At 04:32 PM 3/30/98 +0000, Nick Bostrom wrote:

>Yes, I suggest we call it The Transhumanist Declaration 2.2.

Hi Nick,

I think there may already be a Transhumanist Declaration. My suggestion is to call it "WTA Transhumnist Declaration 2.2;" or "WTA Transhumanist Statement 2.2." This way, it is clearly identified as WTA's take on transhumanist ideas.

I recall a document titled a Transhumanist Doctrine was written some years ago by a few people in Southern California. I am aware that there might be any number of such documents. (I alluded to this on our transhumanism communications.)

Thus, if we title WTA's statement specifically, it might be advantageous.

Thanks,

Natasha

<center>Natasha Vita More [fka Nancie Clark] -- www.natasha.cc

Transhumanist Art Centre - Home of Extropic Art -- www.extropic-art.com

<bigger>**NEW** </bigger><bold>Transhuman Culture InfoMark<bigger>
</bigger></bold>-- www.transhuman.org

PRESS RELEASE: "We are transhumans ..." Meme Orbits Saturn in 2004!

<italic>The best defense is an aesthetic offense.

</italic></center>