What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]

Daniel Gilliland (dang@whc.net)
Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:14:19 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Anton Sherwood: "clones"
Previous message: den Otter: "Re: PHIL: Extropy, Boundaries and Suicide"
In reply to: DOUG.BAILEY@EY.COM: "Re: Credibility of SciAm"
Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
Reply: Darren Reynolds: "Re: PHIL: Extropy, Boundaries and Suicide"

Can someone briefly explain what was so upsetting about the
nanotech article? ... didn't see it, myself.

-dan

Next message: Anton Sherwood: "clones"
Previous message: den Otter: "Re: PHIL: Extropy, Boundaries and Suicide"
In reply to: DOUG.BAILEY@EY.COM: "Re: Credibility of SciAm"
Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
Reply: Darren Reynolds: "Re: PHIL: Extropy, Boundaries and Suicide"