well, I stand corrected.
jeff
CALYK@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 98-02-24 12:25:08 EST, you write:
>
> << CALYK@aol.com wrote:
>
> > it can also be vaporized, which doesnt have all the bad things smoke has,
> or
> > eaten.
>
> and when eaten, the drug works more efficiently. A large portion of the
> drug
> is wasted when vaporized (and water filtered) then even more when you exhale
> after a smoke..
> >>
>
> Actually it's the other way around, vaporizing is the most efficient method,
> as you can inhale 100% of the THC, whereas with smoking only 20-50% is
> inhaled, the rest is incinerated. Eating is even less efficient than smoking,
> you need about 3 times as much material. The high is also different with each
> of these methods.
>
> danny