> on the other hand, does anyone really trust that New Scientist story?? I've
> never heard of this publication before. Can someone here validate their
> reliability??
While the original posting made the exaggerated claim that it was the
most respectable scientific journal around, it is still
respectable. It is not a peer-reviewed research journal like Science
or Nature, rather it is about science for scientists, a kind of
"semi-popular science" not unlike Scientific American. In general it
holds a fairly high class.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y