Re: POLL: Strong AI Hypothesis: for or against

CountZero (count_zero@bigfoot.com)
Tue, 03 Feb 1998 13:15:35 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Lorrey: "Re: Chimp Diet"
Previous message: DOUG.BAILEY@ey.com: "Re: Tax (was: "Dick Armey: Scientist?")"
In reply to: Stirling Westrup: "Re: POLL: Strong AI Hypothesis: for or against"

I'm inclined to _believe_ that strong AI is very likely, I don't
necessarily think be by _design_ as in current "expert systems", more
likely it will arise as a (hopefully) controlled evolutionary process
involving self configuring hardware/software.
I see no reason why it must be modeled in a one to one fashion with the
human brain, after all there is a great deal of superfluous functionality
in the brain and in any case the hardware base is likely to be _very_
dissimilar.
Try to think of it as evolution in action. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Business Security 5.5
iQA/AwUBNNcgtiDO+gohXlcOEQJJtgCgknwQmRLs9x+iX3LaK4jILSpu5agAoJxL
F5w5NJ9Pjcx+n1RAPbEgUCCE =8cwu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next message: Michael Lorrey: "Re: Chimp Diet"
Previous message: DOUG.BAILEY@ey.com: "Re: Tax (was: "Dick Armey: Scientist?")"
In reply to: Stirling Westrup: "Re: POLL: Strong AI Hypothesis: for or against"