Re: Gender issues (was HUMOR: Anti-cryonics philosophy)

Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 20:00:30 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John K Clark: "Before Now"
Previous message: Hara Ra: "Re: SPACE: Lunar Warfare"
Maybe in reply to: Omega: "Gender issues (was HUMOR: Anti-cryonics philosophy)"
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "The Game of Argument (was Plea...)"
Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "The Game of Argument (was Plea...)"

E. Shaun Russell wrote:
>
> <*Sigh*> I truly wonder why some threads seem to boil down to
> inconsequential, insubstantial semantical gender issues. The initial thread
> was a humorous quote taken from the 1994 Miss Universe contest. Then, for
> some reason, Michael Wiik had to re-kindle the not-quite- extinguished
> embers of the genius threads. And suddenly, again we have a nice warm
> bonfire, complete with 'politically correct' flames. So, I'll give $5.00 to
> the genius who can tell me *why*. I'm serious.
>
Email tends to limit our attention spans to the contents of the IN box.

O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O

Next message: John K Clark: "Before Now"
Previous message: Hara Ra: "Re: SPACE: Lunar Warfare"
Maybe in reply to: Omega: "Gender issues (was HUMOR: Anti-cryonics philosophy)"
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "The Game of Argument (was Plea...)"
Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "The Game of Argument (was Plea...)"