One benefit I have found from participating in debates on the net over
the years is the development of a thicker skin. Our recent discussion
here with David Brin was a good test of this. I try to focus on the
points I can address objectively and ignore the name calling. It's not
always easy, though.
> One does run the risk of being vocally, spectacularly, wrong. Eli
> has assigned moral judgment to plants; I once proudly advocated
> government funding of research. I shudder at those once eloquent
> pronouncements of mine, and how they might have affected the minds
> of others, but I cannot dwell on error. I must simply say "I was
> wrong", and get on with the business of learning. No apologies, no
> regrets, no limits.
I agree with the importance of being able to admit when you are wrong.
This is another thing which I have tried to work on. Fortunately, I am
wrong quite a bit so I get a lot of practice!
Hal