> Didn't the CM-2 use a lot of very small ALUs (1-bit? 4-bit?) and then use
> them in groups?
I seem to recall (I can't find the manual on my messy desk) that several
one-bit processors shared a single ALU, maybe 4-bit but perhaps larger.
Ah, I really like that architecture despite its drawbacks, it was quite
fun to program (and my programs made nice patterns on the front LEDs).
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
nv91-asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~nv91-asa/main.html
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y