Re: AI:This is how we do it

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Feb 19 2002 - 08:39:09 MST

Next message: neptune@mars.superlink.net: "SPACE: Cycler orbits"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Special difficulties of AI terminology"
In reply to: Simon McClenahan: "Re: AI:This is how we do it"
Next in thread: Damien R. Sullivan: "Re: AI:This is how we do it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Simon McClenahan wrote:
>
> Friendliness and Seediness I see as different applications of AI, each with
> its own purpose. These applications are programmed on top of a General AI,
> which is the theoretical base of all AI.

Seed AI = General AI + self-improving AI + Friendly AI. I'd guess that, in
terms of effort, building a seed AI is likely to be 80% building general
intelligence, 10% making it self-improving intelligence, and 10% making it
Friendly.

-- -- -- -- --
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence

Next message: neptune@mars.superlink.net: "SPACE: Cycler orbits"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Special difficulties of AI terminology"
In reply to: Simon McClenahan: "Re: AI:This is how we do it"
Next in thread: Damien R. Sullivan: "Re: AI:This is how we do it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:40 MST