Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc..

• Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Active shields again, was Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Blah blah blah"
• Previous message: my inner geek: "Hardness, Surveillance, EMP (Make me write bad checks)"
• In reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Next in thread: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'd be honored, sir! Try not to edit out the pith. :)

"Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" wrote:
>
> "Michael M. Butler" wrote:
> >
> > You are right that "who do you trust?" becomes ever more important as
> > power concentrates. As I never tire of repeating, even something as
> > rudimentary as Axelrod's _The Evolution of Cooperation_
> > (http://pscs.physics.lsa.umich.edu/Software/CC/ECHome.html if you're
> > lazy) points out that rough parity between players is essential for
> > cooperation to be a successful, evolutionarily stable strategy.
>
> Can I quote you on that in _Friendly AI_?
>
> -- -- -- -- --
> Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/
> Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence

• Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Active shields again, was Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Blah blah blah"
• Previous message: my inner geek: "Hardness, Surveillance, EMP (Make me write bad checks)"
• In reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Next in thread: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:18 MDT