At 04:48 PM 3/13/00 -0600, Joe Dees wrote:
>Howzabout THIS for not only pejorative, but irretrievably true? The
>cruel and cynical actions of the NRA, as distinguished from their
>Madison Avenue bullshit spindoctor-manufactured Hollywood (Prez
>Charleton Heston? Yagottabekidding!) image, would lead one to
>necessarily believe that the voting majority of their members are
>soulless ghouls who have perpetual hard-ons for and wear their
>emotionally overwrought and bleeding hearts on their sleeves for
>lifeless and engineered-for-the-express-purpose-of-death-dealing
>hunks of metal, but cannot muster a shred of sympathy for dead
>little girls. They DO sociopathically, and quite obviously, care
>more for killing machines than they do for their fellow human
>beings, although to call the rest of the race their "fellows" slurs the
>rest of humanity by association with pond scum. It might be
>impolite to call sick, twisted, demented and bloodthirsty
>("PLEASE, Lord, lemme meet a mugger today and legally kill 'im!)
>psychopaths what they are, but the truth, by definition, can
>NEVER be an insult!
geeez us key riest, man... are you trying to systematically destroy any
chance of rational discussion? "the cruel and cynical actions of the nra"
implies a couple of very raw assertions, for which you offer no support.
that does not help your case. your above rant, while perhaps interesting
for its incitive qualities, is funny in the same way that watching an old
lady with a walker get run over by a train might be. joe... i love ya
man... but YOUR NOT HELPING! if you resume your former high-volume
behavior, and your post quality is on the order of the above, i will have
no choice but to ploink ya.
sayke, v2.3.05
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:05:04 MDT