>> Your phrase, "an organization that fights to keep more guns than people
>> in circulation" is obviously pejorative and not conducive to polite
>> disagreement. Please reconsider using such language.
> I politely disagree. A statement of fact, no matter how blunt, is
> neither pejorative nor inconducive to polite disagreement. If I had
> called the NRA and its sympathizers "violent antisocial irrational
> paranoid maniacs," *that* would be pejorative.
Your so-called statement of fact is a statement about the desired goal
of an organization. Since it is contrary to the publicly stated goals
of that organization, and contrary to the personal goals of everyone I
have ever met who belongs to that organization it is not only pejorative
but clearly a delibrate lie to discredit an opponent you know little
about rather than having to do the hard work of arguing actual facts.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:05:02 MDT