Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 21:09:15 MST

Next message: Robert Owen: "Re: failure of debate"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: imaging the world"
Maybe in reply to: Brent Allsop: "Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
Next in thread: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
Reply: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Max More has asked,
> ...can mind be explained naturalistically or do we
>need to resort to a supernatural explanation?

I don't think we need to resort to a supernatural explanation, but why do we
need to explain mind?

Cheers,

--J. R.

Next message: Robert Owen: "Re: failure of debate"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: imaging the world"
Maybe in reply to: Brent Allsop: "Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
Next in thread: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
Reply: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:35 MDT