Re: Bluntness & Cryonics [was: a gentlebluntperson speaks...]

From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Sun Feb 13 2000 - 17:27:07 MST

Next message: Travas Gunnell: "Re: Optional Reading"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: Black hole question"
In reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Bluntness & Cryonics [was: a gentlebluntperson speaks...]"
Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: Bluntness & Cryonics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Robert J. Bradbury wrote:

> Lets just say that Dr. Campbell and I had a fairly strong disagreement
> about how difficult it would be to use biotech to augment the human
> genome.

Please disregard my previous post, asking for an explanation of Roberts
protest at E4. I think this covers it. Thanks! spike

Next message: Travas Gunnell: "Re: Optional Reading"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: Black hole question"
In reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Bluntness & Cryonics [was: a gentlebluntperson speaks...]"
Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: Bluntness & Cryonics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:43 MDT