[sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?
From: Filipe Sobreira (warlordbcm1@yahoo.com.br)
Date: Thu Feb 05 2009 - 13:27:54 MST
- Next message: Heartland: "Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?."
- Previous message: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- In reply to: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Next in thread: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Reply: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
precludes them to share all the other properties (unless you assume all their particles in quantum entanglement, but this is precluded mainly by the uncertainty principle) they don't even are physically identical. This what you wrote in the last paragraph is kinda circular argument, and really does not make any point, in my humble opinion. There are two bodies in the room and two person, and this could easily be tested and proved.
>John K Clark
Filipe Sobreira
"Adtollite portas principes vestras
Et elevamini portae aeternali
Et introibit rex gloriae.
Quis est iste rex gloriae?"
(Psalm 23(24):7–8a)
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
- Next message: Heartland: "Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?."
- Previous message: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- In reply to: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Next in thread: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Reply: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:04 MDT