Re: CEV specifies who the AI cares about (was Re: Can't afford to rescue cows)

From: Nick Tarleton (nickptar@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2008 - 16:38:39 MDT

Next message: Matt Mahoney: "Defining friendliness (was Re: Can't afford to resuce cows)"
Previous message: Nick Tarleton: "Re: What if there's an expiration date? (was Re: Arbitrarily decide who benefits)"
In reply to: Matt Mahoney: "Re: CEV specifies who the AI cares about (was Re: Can't afford to rescue cows)"
Next in thread: Thomas McCabe: "Re: CEV specifies who the AI cares about (was Re: Can't afford to rescue cows)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Matt Mahoney <matmahoney@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Stefan Pernar <stefan.pernar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe 'to exist = being part of reality'? Suggestions?
>
> To exist = to have a description in a form that can be copied.
> Description can be your DNA, your knowledge, or your source code.

Having runtime (as Lee Corbin would put it) is also important.

Next message: Matt Mahoney: "Defining friendliness (was Re: Can't afford to resuce cows)"
Previous message: Nick Tarleton: "Re: What if there's an expiration date? (was Re: Arbitrarily decide who benefits)"
In reply to: Matt Mahoney: "Re: CEV specifies who the AI cares about (was Re: Can't afford to rescue cows)"
Next in thread: Thomas McCabe: "Re: CEV specifies who the AI cares about (was Re: Can't afford to rescue cows)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT