From: Russell Wallace (russell.wallace@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 23:42:25 MDT
On 8/29/06, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> wrote:
>
> Once we have a few AGI instances out there, and we can understand
> how they work, maybe then I could find an objective answer to your
> question. To be honest, it wouldn't surprise me if all our current
> ideas about AGI were wrong, otherwise we might have one already.
>
Not all. It's slow, painfully despairingly slow, but we do now have some
ideas that are pretty much in the right compass direction at least. We've
walked through the chaos; it's down through computer science and homing in
on software engineering.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT