OT (was Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow)

From: Robin Lee Powell (rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org)
Date: Fri Apr 28 2006 - 15:56:01 MDT

Next message: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Previous message: J. Andrew Rogers: "Re: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
In reply to: Damien Broderick: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Next in thread: Woody Long: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:11PM -0500, Damien Broderick wrote:
> At 03:18 PM 4/28/2006 -0400, Woody Long wrote:
>
> >Irregardless of whether this is true,
>
> You might want to run this clunker through your
> syntactical/semantic engine.

Thank you. Going to

http://www.answers.com/irregardless&r=67

to prove you (Damien) wrong has (slightly) increased my faith in
humanity.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://intelligence.org/

Next message: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Previous message: J. Andrew Rogers: "Re: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
In reply to: Damien Broderick: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Next in thread: Woody Long: "Re: Fwd: We Can Understand Anything, But are Just a Bit Slow"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT