From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@rogers.com)
Date: Fri Feb 24 2006 - 00:37:10 MST
At 01:37 AM 2/24/2006 -0500, Randall Randall wrote:
snip
>You're making a statement including the error correcting
>mechanisms (ECM) which actually exist at the moment, where
>the statement by Eliezer I was responding to was about
>natural selection in general, and I just wanted to point
>out that it seems clear that observed present-day rates
>are not necessarily maximum rates, given that better ECM
>seems possible.
One "error correction" is that somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of all
conceptions fail to implant.
How much of that is due to mutations in bad places is not known.
Keith Henson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT