From: J. Andrew Rogers (andrew@ceruleansystems.com)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 12:31:11 MDT
Damien Broderick wrote:
> As an exercise, examine the semantic content of Eliezer's interlocuter's
> contributions:
>
> At 04:39 AM 5/27/2004 -0400, EY wrote:
>
> How is this distinguishable from the responses of an Eliza-bot?
I see a few obvious possibilities here:
1.) It really is an [Eliza|Eliezer]-bot.
2.) It was constructed to illustrate a point.
3.) Scintillating discourse in the wee hours of the morning is a low
probability event for most humans.
4.) The posted conversation was cut out of a much larger context.
5.) It is a teaser to make you want to donate $25,000 for the Secret
Manuscript and Decoder Ring.
I don't know about you, but I already sent in MY check.
j. andrew rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:47 MDT