From: Ben Goertzel (ben@goertzel.org)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 08:39:05 MDT
Also, my article
http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2002/AIMorality.htm
contains some objections to aspects of Eliezer's thought (which I generally
like very much), laid out in a (slightly) more systematic way than e-mail
posts.
-- Ben
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sl4@sl4.org [mailto:owner-sl4@sl4.org]On Behalf Of Ben
> Goertzel
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 10:32 AM
> To: sl4@sl4.org
> Subject: RE: JOIN
>
>
>
> Hmmm...
>
> Some of us are:
>
> Ben Goertzel (me)
> Kevin Cramer
> Samantha Atkins
> Peter Voss [his objection is that so much talk about FAI is premature]
>
> That is just a highly biased, overly small sample; the list should have
> dozens of people on it, really.
>
> -- Ben Goertzel
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sl4@sl4.org [mailto:owner-sl4@sl4.org]On Behalf Of Keith
> > Elis
> > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 8:25 AM
> > To: sl4@sl4.org
> > Subject: JOIN
> >
> >
> > I'm new to some of you, but this list is not new to me. I've been
> > lurking at the archives since the list opened, periodically, and as time
> > permits. Much of the interesting discussion here revolves around
> > Singularitarian issues, and much of that concerns AI (much of that seed
> > AI, Friendly AI, or if I may, Yudkowskian AI).
> >
> > I'm most interested in the best *objections* to Yudkowskian AI. So far,
> > I've found at the archives only a handful of people who have posted
> > objections (their credibility questionable) and I feel certain I'm
> > missing something. Hence, this JOIN message, and this question:
> >
> > What are the names of the people who have posted intelligent objections
> > to Yudkowskian AI, that appear in the archives, that I may go back and
> > read?
> >
> > Crocker's rules apply.
> >
> > Keith
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:42 MDT