RE: Self-modifying FAI (was: How hard a Singularity?)

From: Ben Goertzel (ben@goertzel.org)
Date: Wed Jun 26 2002 - 12:25:29 MDT

• Next message: James Higgins: "Re: Self-modifying FAI (was: How hard a Singularity?)"
• Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Seed AI (was: How hard a Singularity?)"
• In reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Self-modifying FAI (was: How hard a Singularity?)"
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: How hard a Singularity?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> > Inferring an intention in another human's mind is HARD...
> except in very
> > simple cases, which are the exception, not the rule...
>
> I didn't say it was easy for an infrahuman AI.

I am positing that it might be hard even for a slightly-superhuman AI

ben

• Next message: James Higgins: "Re: Self-modifying FAI (was: How hard a Singularity?)"
• Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Seed AI (was: How hard a Singularity?)"
• In reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Self-modifying FAI (was: How hard a Singularity?)"
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: How hard a Singularity?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:39 MDT