From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Wed Dec 08 1999 - 07:42:21 MST
"Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com> writes:
> Seriously (can I do that here?), though I can't remember the paper
> reference (I do have it, but I have so many papers...) research at
> Bell Labs seems to indicate that your computer *could* hold a
> large fraction of your memories. The experiments they have done
> seem to indicate you store only a few bits a second.
This is likely your *conscious* bandwith. Unconscious learning can be
orders of magnitudes more powerful, increasing storage demands a
lot. Still, the total memory capacity of the brain seems to be within
reach within a few decades at most.
> As I've mentioned in another note, the question remains open
> whether recall capacity and recognition capacity are the same.
> As someone, Hal perhaps?, pointed out, there may be a fair
> amount of compression occuring. I don't have to remember
> walking to school everyday, I only have to remember odd
> events that have occured on a few of the days that I
> walked to school on top of a general pattern of walking
> to school.
Yes, there is plenty of compression, abstraction and plain loss in
memory. Recall capacity in general seems to be smaller than
recognition capacity (because the later doesn't have to reconstruct a
whole scene, just check if the network has a reasonable attractor
corresponding to a memory).
> I don't think this is proven. More likely, as I think Anders has
> pointed out, you may get loss of memory because you don't exercise
> the synaptic connections and they gradually lose strength relative
> to other synaptic connections. You may occasionally "recover" a
> memory if you happen to trigger a global pattern that pieces
> together a memory from widely separated subfragments across the brain.
True. But most forgetting seems to be overwriting or interference
between overlapping memories, or the gradual distortion of memories as
you remember more and more your reconstructions of them and less and
less of the original situation.
The problem is the time constants of learning: too short, and you
learn and forget quickly, too long and you cannot learn quickly and
run the risk of catastrophic forgetting if you overload the whole
system (not observed in any brains so far, though). Another reason we
already seem to have different memory systems with different learning
rates.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:06:00 MST