From: Harvey Newstrom (newstrom@newstaffinc.com)
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 20:14:08 MST
Robert J. Bradbury <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com> wrote on Wednesday, December
01, 1999 2:45 pm,
> I would maintain, that engaging in sexual activities for non-procreation
> purposes is *unnatural* (i.e. it is not in the direct interest of your
> genes), unless you are getting paid for it in some way (this may
> include social contacts, indirect economic benefits, general well being
> from the "rewards" of physical pleasure, etc.)
Any biologist will tell you that homosexuality is found in all species of
mammal higher than a cat. Maybe all these species are acting "unnaturally"
according to your definition, but I would suggest you find a different term.
-- Harvey Newstrom <mailto://newstrom@newstaffinc.com> <http://harveynewstrom.com> Author, Consultant, Engineer, Legal Hacker, Researcher, Scientist.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:54 MST