From: hal@finney.org
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 16:36:01 MST
According to John Grigg, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> Anything that helps the group survive improves the
> breed.
>
> An example: Drones help a beehive survive. Just because they don't produce
> does not mean that they are an evolutionary dead end. Their evolution was
> crucial in the survival of hive-based groups. By having non-reproducing
> workers do all the engineering and work, this frees up the breeders to do
> nothing but breed. Neither could survive without the other. People who
> think that the breeders are highly evolved while the drones are unevolved,
> deviant evolutionary mistakes, is not recognizing the full range of
> evolutionary processes. Evolution developed the entire hive structure to
> allow the propagation of each succeeding generation.
The difference is that drones share many of the genes with the queen and
with the other bees. I'm not sure of the details, but they may even all
be clones of each other. At least that's how it is with ants. It is
because the workers share so many genes with the reproducing organisms
that group selection works effectively with hive insects.
Without such close kinship, group selection has a weak effect and
will tend to be dominated by individual selection. An individual who
reproduces will tend to have more of his genes propagated than one who
does not but who benefits the group as a whole.
Hal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:54 MST