Re: SOC: Tractatus Theopoliticus (was: Is vs. Ought)

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 01:17:54 MST

Next message: Max More: "Re: Transhumanist Dictionary [was Re: Is vs. Ought]"
Previous message: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: FW: >H here we go"
In reply to: phoenix@ugcs.caltech.edu: "Re: SOC: Tractatus Theopoliticus (was: Is vs. Ought)"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: SOC: Tractatus Theopoliticus (was: Is vs. Ought)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> (The other Damien, these days.)
> (Hey, Eric's posting again. Maybe the stars are right for another Old Fogey
> Backlash... nah, probably can't be bothered.)

Why not? All these people constantly gyrating in and out, why not
setting a rendez-vous in time?

A virtual party at the end of Millenium...

Next message: Max More: "Re: Transhumanist Dictionary [was Re: Is vs. Ought]"
Previous message: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: FW: >H here we go"
In reply to: phoenix@ugcs.caltech.edu: "Re: SOC: Tractatus Theopoliticus (was: Is vs. Ought)"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: SOC: Tractatus Theopoliticus (was: Is vs. Ought)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:53 MST