Re: FW: >H here we go

From: Dan Fabulich (daniel.fabulich@yale.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 29 1999 - 20:21:13 MST

Next message: Spike Jones: "transplant progress..."
Previous message: James Daugherty: "Re: Adkins Can't Be That Ignorant"
In reply to: O'Regan, Emlyn: "FW: >H here we go"
Next in thread: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: FW: >H here we go"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

'What is your name?' 'O'Regan, Emlyn.' 'IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOUR NAME
IS!!!'

> > http://salon.com/21st/feature/1998/11/23feature.html

^^^^^^^^^^

> > why is it that when the future gets here it looks so exceedingly
> > ORDINARY?

Probably because you've already read about it before! It's OLD NEWS.

-Dan

      -unless you love someone-
    -nothing else makes any sense-
           e.e. cummings

Next message: Spike Jones: "transplant progress..."
Previous message: James Daugherty: "Re: Adkins Can't Be That Ignorant"
In reply to: O'Regan, Emlyn: "FW: >H here we go"
Next in thread: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: FW: >H here we go"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:53 MST