From: Billy Brown (bbrown@transcient.com)
Date: Mon Nov 08 1999 - 13:18:57 MST
Spike Jones wrote:
> Consider for instance the <faithfulness in marriage>. Most would
> recognize that this meme is solidly CFC based, and yet I cannot shake
> this one off even if I tried,
I can't speak for you, of course, but in my experience the actual memes are
more like <convince your spouse that you are faithful> and perhaps <keep
your word>. The first is grounded in biological evolution, and the second
seems to be a sound principle in most viable ethical systems. Add in a
traditional Western marriage vow, and you tend to get either actual fidelity
or hypocrisy.
> and it is unclear to me that I should try.
Interesting. IMO traditional marriage is somewhat harmful even in a
traditional society, and becomes much more so when immortality and a
significant degree of self-modification become possible. (Of course, the
likely emergence of posthumans and SI shortly thereafter renders the
question moot, but it is still an interesting topic).
IMHO, the pros and cons of marital fidelity stack up as follows:
PRO
1) Actual fidelity reduces the prevalence of Sexually transmitted diseases.
2) Purely monogamous relationships place fewer demands on an individual's
self-confidence and tolerance, and are therefore easier for some people to
maintain.
CON
1) A fidelity code does not acknowledge the natural variation in human
desires. A few people actually want a purely monogamous relationship, but
they are at one extreme of a long continuum. At the other end you have
complete free-love types, while in the middle are those who just want to
have an occasional fling. A fidelity code forces almost everyone to
suppress their natural urges, which results in a lot of sexual frustration.
2) Fidelity greatly reduces the spread of sexual skills, while
simultaneously preventing individuals from comparing their personal
abilities with anything except the unrealistic visions of erotic fiction.
The result is frequently a poisonous mixture of ineptitude and insecurity
capable of doing a great deal of damage to otherwise healthy relationships.
3) Monogamy also tends to encourage a whole raft of other relationship
pathologies. By ensuring that sexual frustration is commonplace and
experiential calibration is rare, it makes it easy for relatively minor
problems to grow into serious ones. At the root of the problem is the fact
that the idea that a single individual will always be able to satisfy all of
your needs is simply unrealistic, but under monogamy there is no
alternative. Dissatisfactions that would otherwise be manageable will
therefore tend to build up indefinitely, ultimately leading to all sorts of
unpleasant results.
4) A fidelity code create a perverse ethical landscape. It rewards those
who cheat successfully while punishing both those who abide by the rules and
those who get caught breaking them. The result is a memetic selection
pressure in favor of ideas that support skillful deception (including
self-deception) and hypocrisy.
Overall, I think the scales are clearly tipped against fidelity. It may
work well for some small fraction of the population, but I expect that a
large majority of us would be better off with some alternative system.
Billy Brown, MCSE+I
bbrown@transcient.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:44 MST