From: John Holmes (jsholmes@mit.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 04 1999 - 01:37:23 MST
fair point. it just seemed that in the context of the discussion about
humanity's rise, the important replicators are not the ones without
evolution.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-extropians@extropy.com
[mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.com]On Behalf Of Robert J. Bradbury
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 8:30 PM
To: extropians@extropy.com
Subject: RE: MEMES: and things.
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, John Holmes wrote:
> it seems important to point out that replicators separate from a context
of
> variation and selection are unimportant and uninteresting. memes and genes
> both fit these requirements, while most computer viruses do not.
>
Well, I'd point out it *is* replicators in a context *without*
variation and selection that allow you to rapidly disassemble
planets and do other feats of astroengineering. Adding the
variation and selection is what gives you the distinct
possibility of them creating a home for themselves rather
than for you.
Don't dis the replicators, they can do a lot for you. :-)
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:42 MST