From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Fri Oct 29 1999 - 16:23:12 MDT
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Bryan Moss wrote:
>
> Does this mean my dog is a sociopath? I'm not sure how
> human sleep differs from animal sleep, but I'm quite sure
> animals sleep longer on average.
>
I suspect sleep tends to be a species specific. Dogs
[were] carnivores, well adapted to their environment with
few worries (other than the pack heirarchy). At times
when you cannot be doing anything to better your position
or genes (too dark for hunting or the pack leader is sleeping
off a full stomach or no females in heat) then the best
thing you can do is sleep. I suspect dog packs are a
classic example of situations where most animals sleep while
a few take watch. Your personal dog is probably even better
off -- the "head" of its own pack (of 1?) & food is served at
regular intervals and sex a fleeting opportunity. Why not sleep?
> My first response to the above would be that sociopaths have
> *very* little stimulation in their environments, whereas
> mystics are probably dropping acid on a regular basis. Lack
> of stimulation often leads to sleep.
I thought about this. But it is more likely that the sociopath
in these environments is less able to exercise his internal
desires (in contrast to the mystic who has probably trained
them down to a hardly noticable perceptual level). The mystic
has much greater relative control over the things s/he "wants" so
there is a smaller gap between the external and internal realities.
> Being 'in tune' with reality could be considered greater
> stimulation (although sometimes it is seen as tranquility).
If you are 'satisfied', then the survival mechanism involved
in reviewing memories for lessons, opportunities, developing
schemes for escape, etc. is probably much less active.
> However, being out of tune with reality seems to lead to an
> even greater level of stimulation (in the form of worry,
> needless emotion, etc). As you say, too much comfort can
> lead to sleep, and obviously discomfort can lead to a lack
> of sleep, so the whole situation seems to be a fine balance.
Precisely. Stimulation per se is not the driver, it is the
gap between the desired stimulation and the actual stimulation.
Paraphrasing something I once heard -- "Do not change the
beliefs [or the envioronment], instead transform the believer".
It isn't a question of whether you have the things you want
but whether you want the things you have.
> In those kind of situations it's better to be woken up than
> to fall asleep.
But then you never get to see how it turns out...
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:39 MST