Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)

From: Replicant00@aol.com
Date: Sat Oct 23 1999 - 14:54:23 MDT

• Next message: Replicant00@aol.com: "Re: "objectivist art" was Rand and Romanticism"
• Previous message: Robert Owen: "Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)"
• Maybe in reply to: Replicant00@aol.com: "Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)"
• Next in thread: Clint O'Dell: "Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 10/23/1999 10:52:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
clintodell@hotmail.com writes:

<<
 Sounds like philosophy if they are defining a way of life without
 consequence in a next life. >>

I have never heard of Taoists believing in a next life, did you make this up?

• Next message: Replicant00@aol.com: "Re: "objectivist art" was Rand and Romanticism"
• Previous message: Robert Owen: "Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)"
• Maybe in reply to: Replicant00@aol.com: "Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)"
• Next in thread: Clint O'Dell: "Re: Tao of Physics - fun claptrap (was religion bashing)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:35 MST