Re: Information growth patterns [was Is lifespan following Moore's Law]

From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Thu Oct 14 1999 - 20:51:37 MDT

Next message: Spike Jones: "jeff's post"
Previous message: Damien Broderick: "A C Clarke's next 100 years"
In reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Information growth patterns [was Is lifespan following Moore's Law]"
Next in thread: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: Is lifespan following Moore's Law (ie: increasing exponential ly)?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Robert J. Bradbury wrote:

> >From now on I think I'll put you in the FO class (Feynman offspring).

Oh so thaaaaats what FO means. Several women I was trying
to impress would tell me that, and I never realized it was a
coooompliment! {8^D spike

Next message: Spike Jones: "jeff's post"
Previous message: Damien Broderick: "A C Clarke's next 100 years"
In reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Information growth patterns [was Is lifespan following Moore's Law]"
Next in thread: O'Regan, Emlyn: "RE: Is lifespan following Moore's Law (ie: increasing exponential ly)?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:31 MST