A C Clarke's next 100 years

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri Oct 15 1999 - 06:19:08 MDT

• Next message: Spike Jones: "Re: Information growth patterns [was Is lifespan following Moore's Law]"
• Previous message: Joseph Sterlynne: "Re: Transhumanism in History (Was something else)"
• Next in thread: Forrest Bishop: "Re: >H A C Clarke's next 100 years"
• Reply: Forrest Bishop: "Re: >H A C Clarke's next 100 years"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

http://cnn.com/ASIANOW/asiaweek/99/0820/cs2.html

Arthur's timescale for nano is rather conservative, but it worries me more
(as I've said before) that he continues to places credence in `cold fusion'
(even giving Pons and Fleischman a Nobel in a few years). Or does he, after
all, know something we don't...?

Damien Broderick

• Next message: Spike Jones: "Re: Information growth patterns [was Is lifespan following Moore's Law]"
• Previous message: Joseph Sterlynne: "Re: Transhumanism in History (Was something else)"
• Next in thread: Forrest Bishop: "Re: >H A C Clarke's next 100 years"
• Reply: Forrest Bishop: "Re: >H A C Clarke's next 100 years"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:31 MST