From: Brian D Williams (talon57@well.com)
Date: Wed Oct 13 1999 - 08:15:17 MDT
From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <retroman@turbont.net>
>Unions once were an effective means of collective bargaining, and
>may still play a part in some professions, however any profession
>that is based on knowledge and intelligence has no rational need,
>IMNSHO, for a union unless there evolves some sort of monopoly
>buyer of professional labor. Unions were needed when there were
>only three steel companies, one oil company, three car companies,
>etc, and anyone who worked in those industries was dependent on
>those companies for their living. If these conditions are not met,
>then it is the union that is trying to manipulate and extort the
>market. The ABA, the AMA, the NEA and others are IMHO
>manipulative, extortionary unions that should have anti-trust
>actions taken against THEM.
Unions are still an effective means of collective bargaining, and
will continue to play a part.
Unions are the result of bad management, effective management can
always stay Union free if it is willing to pay the price. I'll give
you an example.
Donnelly publishing has a non-union print shop, this is very
unusual since most of Donnelly's business is with Union companies,
like Ameritech. Here's how they've avoided it. Donnelly pay's it
people at, or slightly above Union scale and benefits, as a result
the union never gets voted in, and since the employee's have had a
choice their is nothing Union labor can do. Donnelly's willing to
pay the price, so they get to call the shots, as long as they don't
abuse this too seriously.
This is clearly a parasitical relationship, the employees at
Donnelly as well as all other workers in the same general area are
enjoying the benefits of Union labor's efforts, without paying the
price. however if the union was to disappear entirely the living
standard of the rest would decline.
Match the top ten average salarie's by city with the percentage of
Unionization, they match exactly.
>It is no accident that in the US only 14% of private sector
>employees are unionized while 37% of government sector employees
>are unionized. It shows that the extortionists are clumping
>together at the center of power. In the private sector, no company
>can maintain pricing control over the market to pass off
>extortionate union demands to the consumer for long, as there will
>always be a non-unionized alternative in the free market that can
>compete better than the unionized firm.
>Stockholders will thus maintain pressure on management to prevent
>excessive union concessions. In the government, since union
>lobbying money is not limited, the government employee unions are
>the most powerful voice, which is why taxes and budgets always go
>up, or never go down for very long. The politicians do not
>effectively represent the taxpayer as shareholders in the
>political corporation.
Unions are the result of bad management, the government being the
worst of management, therefore has the most Union employees.
I agree with you on the need for competitive forces, being on the
inside I see how easily the slovenly would resort to devolution to
human amoebas if we let them, clearly demonstrating the flaws of
socialism. I fight a continual battle against the forces of such
darkness. ;) Our apprentice school also offers continuing education
for those already at Journeyman, 100% computer literacy is the
goal. Many of us stress constantly the need to stay relevant.
I on the other hand, am on the other side of the coin, the company
would have to pay ALOT more for someone who has the skills I do,
the fact they can put Union people in IT jobs helps hold down the
costs....
Companies have a monopoly on who they can hire/fire, an individual
has no power in such a circumstance if the company acts
collectively to maintain this monopoly. It was such action that led
to the first Unions.
Doctors, in the face of collective actions by HMO's are forced to
organize to do the same.
A fun part of the game is that companies still have a turn of the
century attitude towards Unions, you should have seen the faces at
the last contract negotiation when we sat down, pulled out laptops,
fired up Excel, and said "We thought we'd start with a look at
management compensation over the last three years, the recent 6%
increase in stock dividends and the 2 billion dollar stock buy
back." We settled for a modest 4.3% over three years.....
Union pension funds by the way are some of the biggest stock
holders.
Brian
Member, Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Mars Society, www.marssociety.org
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:30 MST